Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Cruickshank, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Flores-Opazo, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Tuesta, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Reyes, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-17T15:55:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-17T15:55:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uoh.cl/handle/611/806 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of maximum respiratory pressure is vital when tracking disease progression and devising treatment strategies. Previous studies indicate a learning effect when undertaking maximum respiratory pressure measurements. The extent of this learning effect and methodologies undertaken to mitigate this learning effect have not been investigated systematically. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the magnitude of improvements in maximum respiratory pressure in response to respiratory muscle warm-up protocols and repeated measures of maximum respiratory pressure in healthy individuals and clinical populations? METHOD.: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was undertaken during August 2021 for studies examining the intrarater reliability of maximum inspiratory or expiratory pressure, or both, studies developing a protocol or an intervention to obtain maximum values, and studies analyzing the reliability of repeated maneuvers in a single testing session in healthy individuals and clinical populations. Included articles were analyzed critically using two appraisal tools. Standardized mean differences with 95% CIs were calculated and corrected for the sample size as a measure of the magnitude of change in maximum respiratory pressure outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1,969 articles retrieved, 32 were included in the meta-analysis. Eighteen studies included healthy individuals and 14 studies included individuals with chronic medical conditions. The overall effect of inspiratory muscle warm-up protocols was higher (effects size [ES], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.63) in comparison with single testing session studies (ES, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.35) and studies performing repeated testing sessions of maximum respiratory pressure (ES, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-022). INTERPRETATION: Inspiratory muscles warm-up procedures induce higher increases in maximum inspiratory pressure in comparison with single and repeated testing sessions of maximum respiratory pressure in healthy individuals. Warm-up protocols are more effective to obtain the maximum performance of inspiratory muscles in one testing session in comparison with other methods. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Direccion General de InvestigacionUniversidad Andres Bello | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Multiple Sclerosis Society of Western Australia | |
dc.relation.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.04.144 | |
dc.subject | maximal respiratory pressure | |
dc.subject | reproducibility of results | |
dc.subject | respiratory function tests | |
dc.title | Reproducibility of Maximum Respiratory Pressure Assessment A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | |
dc.type | Artículo | |
uoh.revista | CHEST | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.chest.2022.04.144 | |
dc.citation.volume | 162 | |
dc.citation.issue | 4 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | Flores Opazo, Marcelo/0000-0001-8743-1708 | |
uoh.indizacion | Web of Science |
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
El Repositorio Académico de la Universidad de O'Higgins es una plataforma de difusión documental que recopila, respalda y difunde la producción científica y académica de nuestra casa de estudios. En su interfaz, se integran diferentes tipos de documentos, tales como, libros, artículos académicos, investigaciones, videos, entre otros, los cuales pueden ser difundidos y utilizados con fines académicos y de investigación.
Los recursos contenidos en el repositorio son de libre acceso en texto completo, a excepción de aquellos que por restricciones propias del Derecho de Autor o por petición expresa de la autoría principal, no pueden ser difundidos en la condición mencionada.