Repositorio Académico UOH

Bibliotecas Universidad de O'Higgins



Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Ntontis, E
dc.contributor.author Vestergren, S
dc.contributor.author Saavedra, P
dc.contributor.author Neville, F
dc.contributor.author Jurstakova, K
dc.contributor.author Cocking, C
dc.contributor.author Lay, S
dc.contributor.author Drury, J
dc.contributor.author Stott, C
dc.contributor.author Reicher, S
dc.contributor.author Vignoles, VL
dc.date.accessioned 2024-01-17T15:54:46Z
dc.date.available 2024-01-17T15:54:46Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.uoh.cl/handle/611/617
dc.description.abstract Shopping behaviour in response to extreme events is often characterized as panic buying which connotes irrationality and loss of control. However, panic buying has been criticized for attributing shopping behaviour to people's alleged psychological frailty while ignoring other psychological and structural factors that might be at play. We report a qualitative exploration of the experiences and understandings of shopping behaviour of members of the public at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 23 participants, we developed three themes. The first theme addresses people's understandings of panic buying. When participants referred to panic buying they meant observed product shortages (rather than the underlying psychological processes that can lead to such behaviours), preparedness behaviours, or emotions such as fear and worry. The second theme focuses on the influence of the media and other people's behaviour in shaping subsequent shopping behaviours. The third theme addresses the meaningful motivations behind increased shopping, which participants described in terms of preparedness; some participants reported increased shopping behaviours as a response to other people stockpiling, to reduce their trips to supermarkets, or to prepare for product shortages and longer stays at home. Overall, despite frequently using the term 'panic', the irrationalist connotations of panic buying were largely absent from participants' accounts. Thus, panic buying is not a useful concept and should not be used as it constructs expected responses to threat as irrational or pathological. It can also facilitate such behaviours, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.
dc.description.sponsorship QR seed grant by the School of Psychology and Life Sciences at Canterbury Christ Church University
dc.description.sponsorship UKRI grant(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI))
dc.description.sponsorship ESRC(UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC))
dc.relation.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264618
dc.title Is it really panic buying? Public perceptions and experiences of extra buying at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.type Artículo
uoh.revista PLOS ONE
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0264618
dc.citation.volume 17
dc.citation.issue 2
dc.identifier.orcid Ntontis, Evangelos/0000-0001-8284-6015
dc.identifier.orcid Drury, John/0000-0002-7748-5128
dc.identifier.orcid Jurstakova, Klara/0000-0002-6212-3140
dc.identifier.orcid Neville, Fergus/0000-0001-7377-4507
dc.identifier.orcid Cocking, Chris/0000-0003-2960-9146
dc.identifier.orcid Lay, Siugmin/0000-0001-7800-1554
dc.identifier.orcid Vestergren, Sara/0000-0003-0514-6749
uoh.indizacion Web of Science


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Colecciones


Archivos

Artículos

Tesis

Videos


Cuartiles